|
|
|
LIGHT
AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL?
A
review of the Summer 2005 Blockbuster Season
(Originally
published in Hotdog, September 2005)
It was the summer when Anakin embraced the dark side, the Caped
Crusader returned to Gotham City, and Tom Cruise just wouldn’t
shut up about Katie Holmes. As far as unique experiences go, however,
Summer 2005 may be most notable for Michael Bay greeting the release
of his latest full-tilt, maximum volume blockbuster The Island by
exclaiming “It’s a debacle! It’s the worst opening
weekend I’ve ever had!”
It has, in
short, been a long, weird and baffling summer. Mega-budget productions
touted as cast-iron hits have seriously underperformed, and the
whiff of disappointment has remained in the air despite plenty of
films raking in hundreds of millions of dollars.
Stranger still
is the fact that, in terms of quality, it’s been one of the
strongest summers we’ve seen in years. Movie standards have
generally been higher, the bigger films have been getting better
reviews, and even box-office underperformers like Kingdom of Heaven
and Sahara turned out as flawed but genuinely interesting and entertaining
movies rather than simply rubbish that deserved its fate.
When it comes
to the winners, of course, there’s no surprise in who came
out on top. George Lucas’ traditional bizarre pessimism proved
again to be completely unfounded, as Star Wars – Episode III:
Revenge of the Sith overcame a higher certificate and some of the
creakiest dialogue known to man, conquering the box-office to the
tune of $800 million in worldwide grosses. Cranking up the violence
level and featuring kiddie-unfriendly footage of a crispy-fried
Jedi, Episode III’s tone of doomy betrayal did little to slow
its success, and also sparked off something in other filmmakers,
resulting in a surprisingly provocative shift towards darker Summer
movies with harsh, downbeat edges.
Who could have
predicted that Steven Spielberg would deliberately traumatise Dakota
Fanning with quite so much gusto in his gritty take on War of the
Worlds? Or that Christopher Nolan’s sharply made Batman Begins
would turn a bloke in a bat costume into the kind of multi-layered
character you’d normally find in an arthouse flick? Taken
separately, these were all daring films that amazingly managed to
triumph financially– but arriving together over a two-month
period, they stamped a level of darkness onto Summer 2005 that’s
been more of a curse than a blessing.
The trouble
is that when three of the top films of the summer are all at the
extreme end of the 12A certificate, there’s little around
for one of the biggest sections of the audience– the family.
“Blockbusters by their nature are pitched mainly at adolescent
boys” says Screen International’s Box-office analyst
Robert Mitchell, “but the batch we’ve had this summer
haven’t been so good at crossing over to the general family
audience, and that’s where the big money is. Combine that
with the fact that there’s been fewer genuine family films,
only one Summer CGI animation, and no big sequels like Shrek 2,
and it’s certainly been a contributing factor to the slump.”
Proving this
firmly are the strong showings of the few family films that have
been around during the Summer. There’s been big success for
CG cartoon Madagascar, and also for superhero romp Fantastic Four,
whose $53 million US opening weekend raised Marvel’s fortunes
and managed to briefly turn the tide of the slump. Nobody could
claim that FF is anything but a weak entry in the recent batch of
superhero movies (especially compared to the storming Batman Begins)–
and yet, it won through thanks to being family-friendly popcorn
entertainment in a summer where the competition was virtually non-existant.
Tim Burton’s
candy-coloured Charlie and the Chocolate Factory also scored big-time,
reaching nearly $150 million after just 17 days in the US alone,
while Johnny Depp’s charmingly bonkers performance proved
that while Hollywood may be struck with doubt and uncertainty, it
can still rely on good old-fashioned star power to bring home the
money.
Earlier in
the year, things had not seemed quite so certain, with rumours of
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s alleged marriage-wrecking affair
on the set of Mr and Mrs Smith casting the unwelcome spectre of
the Ben Affleck/J.Lo disaster over the movie’s chances. And
then, there was everybody’s favourite diminutive Scientologist,
as Tom Cruise turned into a publicity hungry lunatic in record time
and found it impossible to restrain himself from leaping onto sofas,
getting engaged to women he’d only just met, and lecturing
talk-show hosts on the insidious evils of psychiatry.
A major celebrity
backlash was expected, and yet what we got was a surprisingly happy
ending, with the frothy cocktail of Mr and Mrs Smith scoring over
$300 million worldwide, and the re-teaming of Minority Report’s
Spielberg and Cruise proving even more profitable, with the combined
gross of War of the Worlds smashing the $500 million barrier. Will
Smith showed that his usual charming streetwise shtick hadn’t
yet worn out its welcome in Hitch, while even the lower-level stars
have shown staying power, with frat-pack regulars Owen Wilson and
Vince Vaughan propelling sleeper hit Wedding Crashers over the $100
million mark in the US.
Of course,
these ‘talent’-heavy successes can’t always be
guaranteed, as proved by the weak US showings of Russell Crowe in
Cinderella Man or Nicole Kidman in Bewitched. It’s worth remembering,
though, that two of the most recent flops– The Island and
Stealth– are movies where the concept was supposed to be the
star, instead of less-known performers like Scarlett Johansen or
Josh Lucas. The consecutive failure of both films could be a sign
that the appetite for the patented Big Dumb Blockbuster™ with
low-level actors and high-level special effects may be dying out
after a decade of prosperity. On the other hand, it could simply
be that both were misconceived from the get-go, and they’ve
helped define the biggest Studio losers of the season, with Sony
and Dreamworks’ live-action division fighting it out for the
wooden spoon award.
So, with the
Summer all but over, what does the near-unbroken slump and the poor
showings of so many movies mean for the future? In practice, if
you look at the big picture, all it really means is that 2004 was
a bonanza year for cinema that 2005 was always going to find nearly
impossible to beat. “Last year,” explains Robert Mitchell,
“you still had a Lord of the Rings movie in January and February-
and then, of course, there was Passion of the Christ. A foreign
language movie opening in March and earning $370 million- that’s
a completely unrepeatable fluke, and it’s meant that 2005’s
been lagging behind almost from the start.”
The one lesson
that should be learned from Summer 2005, however, is don’t
underestimate family audiences, and try not to put all your eggs
in one basket. “We’ve ended up with a weird situation
this year where two of what should be the biggest movies of 2005–
the new Harry Pottter, and King Kong– aren’t opening
till November and December,” says Mitchell. “That’s
a gigantic chunk of this year’s cinema-going that hasn’t
happened yet, and despite the slump, that could well put the industry
back on track. Yes, the summer blockbuster season is always supposed
to be the biggest earner in theory, but it’s often the other
parts of the year that are the deciding factor. You can lose the
summer, and still win the year – it’s only a battle,
not the whole war.”
|